Showing posts with label Literal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Literal. Show all posts

Sunday, February 5, 2017

NIV vs. NASB: Understanding theory of translation

The NIV vs the NASB.
It is important to understand the different types of translations, and that defines what “accurate” means. Which is more accurate - word for word perfect, or something that better communicates the meaning?
There are two ways to translate. one is word for word. This is very “accurate” but it is often hard to read. There are differences in language that make translation difficult. Word for word can actually obscure the intended meaning as seen in the context.
The second option is Dynamic equivalence, which seeks to translate thought for thought, instead of word for word. This is easier to read and conveys the meaning more clearly in the language it is translated into.
The NIV uses the thought for thought theory, while the NASB is more word for word. Both are about the same as far as my definition of accuracy goes, but the NASB is more technically accurate from a word for word standpoint.
But even when you pick one theory or the other, there is still some overlap.
There are also paraphrases, like the Living Bible or The Message. These are not true translations at all, but just a retelling of it in another language. The
se are good for reading large segments at a time, but there is not as much regard for literal word for word accuracy.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Do you take the Bible literally?

Sometimes people ask if I take the bible literally. My answer is, “what do you mean by literal?” Do I take the question literally?
What does the word literally even mean?
Some would say, it means that the text literally means what it says. That is reasonable. But there is also the intent of the writer that must be taken into consideration. Taking words at their face value and ignoring what the intent of the writer was trying to communicate, is not taking it literally from my viewpoint.
When someone writes about a sunset, we know what they are talking about. Most of us know the sun does not really set in the evening. The sun pretty much stays still and the Earth rotates on its axis. This means light from the sun changes on the planet as it revolves. But we still know what is meant when someone says “sunset.”
So if we take it literally in the strictest sense, we would have to dismiss the word sunset as ignorance, because we know the sun does not set. Yet we do know what the intent is, and take the intent literally.
Or to take another example from the natural world. When it is cloudy we say the sun is not shining. What??? The sun is still shining, but is above the clouds and we cannot see it. Yet we know the intent, or literal meaning, when someone says the sun isn't shining because it is cloudy.
So if someone wrote .. “It was cloudy at sunrise, but the sun came out around noon and it was a clear day.” We all know what that means in English, but in the strictest literal interpretation, it is total nonsense. The sun didn't rise, the sun didn't just appear at noon and so forth.
We understand the basics of language, and understand the meaning the writer is communicating based on a variety of things. All of those things combine to give us a “literal meaning.”
So why is it, when we come to the scriptures, that we lose sight of this very common sense way of understanding language?
To say a certain story is meant to be allegorical, is taking it literally, because that is the intent of the writer. We know this by the context and by the type of literature involved.
When Jesus told the parable of the farmer out sowing seeds, we know he was not talking about farming practices, or giving advice on planting. It is clear there is something else in mind there from the writer. Parables are told to make a point, as a teaching tool. To take them as otherwise is to misinterpret the intent of the writer.
The scriptures are inspired by God, and are intended to give us some insight into the spiritual world. It is God's method of communicating truth to us.
God uses language. It is not some mystical thing that only a few can see or understand.
We should try to understand them the same way we understand any piece of written material.
Understand the words used, their meanings, then the context, and the intent of the writer as much as possible from that context.